Baixar Todos Os Vidios De Brent Corrigan Gratis

SINCE 1950 ... NEW

I receive this email, which I think just repeating here, without adding comments ...

"Let's say, so theoretically, there is a ruling party, a ruling party, which, however, formally wants to respect the constitution, not want to violate the substance. It does not make the March on Rome transform the classroom space for the paddles, but wants to establish, without opinion, a disguised dictatorship. Then, what to do to gain control of the schools and to transform the State schools into Party schools? He realizes that the State schools have the defect of being impartial. There is some resistance, in those schools is always there, even under fascism has been there. Then, the dominant party follows another path (it's all a theoretical hypothesis, mind you). He begins to neglect the public schools, to discredit, to impoverish. Let it anemizzino and begins to favor private schools. Not all private schools. The schools of his party, that party. And then all these treatments are beginning to go to private schools. Cure of money and privileges. He even begins to advise the boys to go to these schools, because basically it says are better than those of the state. And maybe give themselves awards, as now I will tell you, or proposes to give awards to citizens who are willing to send their children to public schools rather than private schools. A 'those' private schools. The exams are easier, unless you study and you do best. So the private school becomes a privileged school. The ruling party, could not transform the State schools openly in Party schools, send the dogs to schools to give priority to the state's private schools. Beware, my friends, this conference this is the point that we must discuss. Warning, this is the recipe. We must keep an eye on the cooks of this low kitchen. The operation is done in three ways: I have already said, ruin the State schools. Let go to hell. Depleting their budgets. Ignore their needs. Mitigate the supervision and control over private schools. Do not check its reliability. Let the teachers teach you that do not have the minimum qualifications to teach. Let the examinations are jokes. Giving public money to private schools. This is the point. Giving public money to private schools. "

Calamandrei Piero (Speech delivered at the III Congress in defense of the National School in Rome on February 11, 1950).

Who Best Treats Bursitis

Manie

The new frontier of telematic mania is spreading like wildfire. It is not a site, not a blog, not a chat, not a forum. It is a hybrid of all this, is called Facebook and more deaths of a three-dimensional game of last generation. The mail boxes are overflowing with invitations to join, to become friends with someone already written a sort of contagion that chain letters if you dream of. Now you see people communicating with short phrases like "I'm going to lunch" or "I broke", with people who are in the next room, if not the same. The reason for this phenomenon in much greater detail and explain the most scientifically to what I can do, perhaps the only survivor still not registered, and fiercely determined to resist. And I'm not divorced from the electronic world, participate in forums and chat, I have a blog, visit the sites ... I just do not understand what function has this type of communication to those already mentioned, leaving a considerable space to a thought or a reflection of some more useful and thorough, and also, if we want and hope, the futility smart .. .

Pro Safe Electronic Digital Safe

absurd?

not know what to invent. I read tonight in the journal Andersen in October, a story picked up by the press . It seems that there is a computer program, invented by none other than a descendant of Charles Dickens, able to automatically process a novel, with only a few instructions: gender, type of history, names. And the rest is done by him, the "New Novelist". The system is based on the consideration that each story is built on structural lines are very similar, but suffices to mix them in a different way to get an original story. That someone has really thought about a kind of absurdity I am surprised to a certain point. I'm more surprised if someone really illudesse to compose in this way the masterpiece of his life. But then, considering many things, in the end perhaps do not even wonder: is yet another step towards the flattening of culture, to the approval to progressive inability to think for themselves, and indeed there is a danger that someone shouting to the genius, begin pouring out stories "written" in this way. Poor Dickens, must be turning in his grave.

Actor Vijayis Hindu Or Not

NIGHT

Write at night has an entirely different appeal. The noise of the city are more distant, or otherwise are less frenetic, and leave space to the sounds of home, but there are always that, left free from the superstructure are released in all their mysterious anxiety. We must get used to it, because in the beginning are unknown, can lead to distraction, then slowly even those become part of a soundtrack usual and reassuring. The night is a time suspended, large, free zones, provided that it can be fully exploited. For some, the night is the moment of transgression, for others it is time for reflection, where you can recover that margin necessary solitude, that moment of creativity that day is fragmented into thousands of commitments and tasks. The night is silent, but a silence full of other sounds. Then take over the sleep and fatigue, has now become too fast tomorrow, today, tomorrow, and it's already time to start again ...

Sonyhtddw 7500 Muteki

grooming

"I suppose you'll mind the unfortunate elders who are aged generously dedicating his life to art. Have it all. [...] They want the very short portion of their remaining life was a repetition of the long portion of the previous year. Flare up and get angry about anything, complain about anything. They want to take the reins of everything and all lead to despair. They are never satisfied with anything or anyone. I am one of them. "Orhan Pamuk," My Name is Red ".

But life runs differently, and lives in a row we have to live out in the same, many, many, not all as will want, with different characters with different roles, nothing stays the same but what we want to change and we can not change. To think again, obviously late, when where we could do it. It is not so bad that you do not live life the same life. Basically it means not survive themselves.

What To Expect At The End Of Emphysema

Satire

And the satire is still a serious problem. Beyond a discussion of freedom of expression (which also deserves to be treated at length in part), there really wonder what the satire does not end up producing the opposite effect as desired, and especially when to do it: if ie there is a limit, a boundary beyond which it is best not to venture. Of course one can not deny the positive contribution of a beautiful vignette of a serious talk: a well done sticker amounts to a full article, even without words. Unlike the discourse regarding the comic (if there are still good comedians who make us laugh and above all they are really smart, how many can you count?). A comedian has to know the meaning of the measure, this is where we run a real risk boomerang effect. The exaggeration, the repetition, sometimes the petulance of a topic. Because it offers the next opponent, you give way to proclaim himself persecuted. Certain topics can not be addressed and complaints (only) with jokes, but with facts and evidence. And sometimes, for not picking up the consensus, it is probably really better than silence.

Reptile And Mammal Respiation Rate

PRESS LAST WEEK

Among the news out ...
Never mind the birthday of the president of Milan;
Never mind of who comes and who goes from the island's famous;
Never mind the last book sale;

The newspapers could have half of the pages ... It is true that we are to feed certain characters and certain situations. We should not talk about it. Perhaps we do not even satire, because, as we know, no matter how it is spoken, but only if you do it. Obviously I contradict, because I talk ... but there is no way out ...

Jesus Wrestling Shirts

MAZZINI

One thing that always made me run (one of many ...), it is the habit, now perhaps less present, to translate into Italian and Italian names are not. Certainly the old fascist legacy, when everything had to be expressed in our language, when it became Rascel Rascel and Courmayeur Cortemaggiore ... So as a kid I thought Giulio Verne was an Italian author, and when I discovered that Jules had in fact thought it was poorly written ... Sure, there are geographical names and names of historical figures that are conventionally used translated. We say Paris and Paris (the French say Rome), say, Charlemagne and Charlemagne. All right. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, but must remain so, call Wolfgang Amadeus would be like if the Germans Joseph Verdi say ... I do not think they do. Plus translated names, with the last name that is necessarily the original one, also have a bad sound. What would we say if the British to capture in their history books or James Matteotti Joe Mazzini?

Watch Sean Cody Movies For Free

JOE SERIOUSLY SLOW THE SERIAL

A writer or an author, a character that identifies "right" creates a series of his adventures. The series is a rather widespread, and guarantees a certain security, a think tank from which to draw, since there is always a defined structure in which to make things happen. The cartoon, usually, it is always serial of any kind and, while in the serial novels for the most part apply to yellow. The difference is that, while the comic book characters such as the time is frozen, there is an evolution in the novels. The characters drawn are always the same: the Peanuts are always children, Tintin still a teenager, Dylan Dog has always 33/35 years. I've always dressed the same way (except of course if they have to dress up or dress, is an exception that Mickey Mouse made his debut with a pair of shorts and then change it completely). There is obviously an evolution of style graphics (at least for the characters always assigned to a single artist), but the substance is. The characters of the novels rather older. The novel in the Inspector Montalbano novel accuses the passing years. Maigret at one point retiring, even though his exploits are still (Simenon wanted to stop but then had to continue). Then why books should be read in the chronological order in which they were written, just to capture the evolution (or involution) of the protagonists. Some authors write in advance of the last novel in a series, to close (at least to prevent the character to survive themselves) did Agatha Christie, it seems it has already done Camilleri. Conan Doyle was forced to revive Sherlock Holmes. In comics, there are very few exceptions. In the Peanuts and Mafalda, for example, a series that began the new characters are born, which initially are small, as they grow, but reached a certain point they stop. Apart from this, a series of comic books it can be easily read in any order, because there are hardly historical references with previous episodes (there are also there, of course, but sometimes they are hidden and no effect). An example of a serial comic literary type, which presents characters that is standing still in time (and a stop time itself) is the work of Wodehouse, consisting of three or four main areas, linked together, with interchangeable characters, but immutable , ageless. Although there is still a sequence, even if mild. In short, the serial will be a lifeline for writers. It will be only one way to sell more because the public takes a liking characters and ends up forgiving if a story is not up to another. It will be a way to continue telling the same story. Ultimately, it is always so: even the classical myths were formed by episodes involving the same characters. Even the Homeric heroes or the gods of Olympus were basically serial.

Michigan Football Bogen

do not know how slow the writing is a virtue or a defect. Slow, first, that does not mean "lazy", that is another thing, which is usually negative, however, even if it is legitimate to take a break to recharge the batteries, but that's not laziness. Laziness is not not write because you need a respite, it is not because there is, and even there we should distinguish and investigate the legitimacy of the reasons (and says so lazy ... er ...). The slowness is to give her time to writing, is necessary, that every time varies, depending on what you are writing. Slowly and savor every word, until you find the right one, looking until we are satisfied. Slowness is also going back to revise, review, correct if necessary and to better define what is already written. The risk, I know well that this (sigh) is to keep rehashing the same things to the bitter end. Clear that if you write with a deadline, the slowness is the enemy. It can only attend when you write without emergencies. Simenon was sometimes criticized for excessive productivity, because it would take an average of one week to produce a book. And he's written hundreds ... But the speed does not necessarily mean superficiality. Fred Vargas writes his books, it seems, in 21 days (vacation time). Each has its own rhythms and time. But in this world that goes on the run, a healthy dose of slowness would not hurt, at times, perhaps by helping to thin out the amount for the benefit of quality.

Petite North Face Jacket

Nonsense

Sometimes the language of newspapers falls in love with words and phrases, one fixed and continues to use them in an uncontrolled manner and continue. This is the case, for a long time now, the word "shock." All you have to know that sensationalism has become shock, in the headlines of any newspaper. Judgement shock, shock statement, shocking Vattelapesca. Once there was only John's grandmother Corsaro Nero, to the view that only brings the shock " now the phenomenon is widespread. Possible that there are no other words, at least to diversify? Once or twice is fine, but every day in a newspaper you can find the precise titoletto crying in shock. Then the shock is a very specific thing, and I quote from a dictionary: " emotion, feeling a sudden and violent" . Then there's the shock, but that is Another thing, is to suspect that someone, before you write, there is the past ... I do not know how many of the things for which this term is appropriate to be bothered. I fear that most of the time are just silly .